This is Frankly absurd – An in depth look at Franking Credits

Franking credits, investment, early retirement, financial independenceI prefer to write about my lifestyle and how the choices I make will in time make me rich enough to forego compulsory work. I believe this is the most interesting part of finance and where the most progress can be made for the vast majority of people. However, I will on occasion take the time to dive deep into an investment topic if it is interesting and generally not very well written about. Also because a great deal of you, my fellow shufflers want to know more about investment as well as lifestyle and saving.

So today I describe to you the absurdity of franking credits. When I say absurd, I mean it in the best possible way. The “I can’t believe this is legal” sort of way.

This seemingly innocuous, tiny tax credit can have huge implications to both the growth of your investments and the income you receive during retirement. It also has a special bonus for those who use any sort of credit to purchase shares.

Franking Credits

I find that the best way to think about franking credits (sometimes called ‘tax imputation credits‘), is that they are tax that has already been paid for on your behalf. When you receive Australian dividends, about 80% of those dividends will come with a full franking credit (there are also partial franking credits, but we will cover that a little further down). This franking credit is equal to the 30% tax the company had to pay on the profit they made, which they just gave to you as a dividend. This credit then shows up on your tax return as tax you have already paid!

So for example, a 70c fully franked dividend will come with a 30c franking credit!

Earn $7,000 of fully franked dividends and it is as if you have already paid $3,000 in tax!

Partially franked dividends are those that do not have the full 30% company paid tax attached to them as a franking credit, but somewhat less than this. They still provide an advantage but less so than their fully franked counterparts.

There are also non-franked dividends which are treated just like normal income.

How you are taxed

So when you earn a dividend and a franking credit, you are taxed on the total amount at your marginal tax rate. Following on from the above example…

Earn $7,000 in dividends

Franking Credit = $3,000

Taxable amount  = $10,000

Depending on your total income, you may end up with franking credits that can then be used to offset the tax on other income you have earnt. If you end up with more franking credits than tax liabilities at the end of the financial year, then the government will refund you that franking credit!

Let the magic begin – Accumulation Phase

This little phenomenon is hugely important because unlike the yields of other investment vehicles which are taxed, dividend yield that is fully franked has an immediate 43% advantage against those numbers.

For example, a 4% fully franked dividend yield is comparable to a 5.68% savings account yield.

Another way to look at this is if you were paying 30% tax on that 4%, your yield would only actually be 2.8% after tax.

Those familiar with investing already know that a difference of 1.2% is HUGE. With enough time that will be a difference of hundreds of thousands of dollars.

So to make a comparison between franked and unfranked dividends, we will take 2 hypothetical shufflers, Pete and John who each invest in a different company. Pete and John each earn about the same and so sit in the same tax bracket.

Shares in each company have a capital growth rate of 5% per year and a dividend yield of 4%. Company A’s dividends are fully franked, Company B’s dividends are not franked. Pete invests $100,000 in Company A and reinvests all the dividends after tax.  John invests $100,000  in Company B and also reinvests all the dividends after tax.

In the very first year, Pete is over $1,100 dollars ahead as per the below table.

The difference between buying shares with fully franked dividends and buying shares with unfranked dividends.

Over the course of a lifetime, if all other parameters remain constant, even without investing any more money than that original $100,000 the effects are absolutely staggering.

Staggering, franking credits boost returns by a huge amount over a lifetime.

The difference is about $335,000 when invested and untouched for 30 years.

But why stop there?  If we look at a shuffler who is in a similar position to myself:

  • with a starting balance of about $200,000,
  • adds regular contributions of roughly $35,000 per year; and
  • plans to retire in 10 years on $1,000,000…

we see that franking credits can knock just under a year off of a working career.

Get to a million sooner.

This is pretty good, but you haven’t seen anything yet.

Retirement Phase

As if knocking a year off of your time to retirement was not enough, these franking credits really come into their own during retirement!

That is because any excess franking credits you have above your tax liability will get refunded to you. You may not have worked a day during the whole financial year, and the government will have to give you money back come tax time!

Let’s go back to our example of Pete and John. It is sometime down the road and both Pete and John have shuffled their way to retirement, each with $1,000,000 in shares with Companies A and B above. Woohoo, good for them. Pete still has all his income derived from fully franked dividends and John has all his income from unfranked dividends. You would be forgiven for thinking that their incomes are the same at this point, but generous Australian government taxation laws mean their incomes are actually quite different.

Pete has $11,000 more to spend or reinvest as he sees fit!

As you can see, Pete got a huge tax refund, where John had a tax liability, seriously affecting his spending money during retirement.

So my personal criterion for reaching retirement isn’t actually $1,000,000 but $40,000 in income. To achieve $40,000 in yearly income without the effects of any franking credits, I would need $1,200,000!

The Combined effect

So going back to the example above of a shuffler in roughly the same position as me at the moment, the combined effect of increased gains and needing a lower amount of capital to reach your income target makes for a truly astonishing combined effect.

Income if you retire on 100% franked dividends vs unfranked dividends. Assuming a starting portfolio size of $200,000 and $35,000 yearly contributions.

That is right, 4.5 years longer to attain the same income if you choose 0% franked dividends (n.b. all international shares are 0% franked)

Things get even better

How can this get any better, do you ask?

If you are in the fortunate position of having someone you want to spend your life with, then by splitting the income between the 2 of you, you will also increase your tax refund! Pushing down your years to FI even further.

Partnering up can put more dollars in your back pocket.
A bonus for those using credit.

So I suppose you are thinking this is freaking magic right about now. But did you know that those who choose to use a loan of some description benefit even more!

You know how you can negative gear with property? You can do the same thing with shares!

Except if you have 100% franked dividends, the negative gearing occurs even when your investment is actually cash flow positive! Take for example Pete and John again, except this time they are each funding half of their investments through a loan against their investment properties.

Positive cashflow investment, still reducing your tax liability!

As can be seen in the above table both John and Pete received a $4,000 dividend and paid $3,000 in loan interest. John without his franking credits had to pay $345 in tax for his investment this year. On the other hand, Pete, because of Franking credits, actually reduced his tax liability by $778!


At this point I am sure you believe, just as I do that franking credits are pure witchcraft. Witchcraft that I want maximum exposure to.

In summary franking credit can have the following effects if your investments are set up correctly:

  • Increase growth rate of your portfolio.
  • Decrease the total portfolio size you need to hit a certain income level.
  • Can make a positive cash flow leveraged investment still reduce your tax liability for the year.

In my particular circumstance the difference is over 4 year of extra work for a completely unfranked portfolio vs a fully franked portfolio. I’m not the biggest fan of just working  my life away. So though it is always important to have very diversified investments, given these extreme taxation benefits I choose to be overweight in Australian shares to increase the Franking percentage of my portfolio.

Shuffling my investments options.

Pat the Shuffler


20 Replies to “This is Frankly absurd – An in depth look at Franking Credits”

    1. Hey another shuffler!

      It all depends on what the companies decide to do with the money really. Because even though the companies tax goes down, our tax remains the same.

      So if the company just increases dividends and reinvestment in the companies growth by the same amount each (i.e. by the amount they save on tax) then it will have absolutely zero impact on our take home pay. The dividend will go up by the same amount that franking goes down.

      However if the company decides they’ll use the extra tax break completely by increasing dividends (and not increasing the amount they reinvest in the company) then our total take home pay will go up!

      In short, less tax should mean more money back in the companies pockets, it should translate to higher growth rates or larger dividend yields, which either way is good for us as owners. Though it will be very hard to see with all the ‘noise’ in share price movement, it should show up on company profit balance sheets over the longer term.

      I’m looking at high yield ETFs and VHY in particular. Ironically enough I’m just rebalancing toward international ATM because I started my investment journey not diversifying internationally at all, so I am more overweight Australian than I even want to be. I’ll probably buy VHY as my next Australian purchase.

  1. This is a great article Pat. Very informative and well written 🙂

    Diversification is important no doubt.

    But there’s a reason why most fund managers will include Australian share as a decent chuck (30% +) of most portfolio’s…Franking credits of course!

    PS. You can have a negatively geared investment property that is cash flow positive too btw. Depreciation is also very magical haha

    1. Ah man, I will admit, I did forget about the depreciation. When you write it all down it does paint a picture of a system that is set up to benefit those that want to get ahead in life. There is a reason beyond home bias to buy into Aussie shares. It is more a home ground advantage than a home bias. Thanks for stopping by Aussie Firebug.

  2. Hi Pat,

    I think the question is, is it possible to build an ETF portfolio with 30% Australian Index, 40% Internation Index + 30% U.S. Index that’s 100% franked?

    What’s the best asset allocation that could maximize this franking credit magic?

    1. Hi

      As far as I know there are only franking credits for Australian based companies listed on the ASX, so unfortunately it is not possible. It is up to each one of us top weigh up the risk and reward and come up with our own target allocations.

  3. Fantastic post, Pat; clearly explained with lots of detail. You’ve really made a super strong argument for accessing a tax break that I bet investors from other countries are jealous of!

    1. It is very nice to have this tax benefit, it does make you think about the Australian tax system a bit where we are taxed quite highly but there are breaks to be had for those who seek them out. Thanks for the compliment 🙂

  4. Hi Pat,

    Fantastic post. I came here from the FI Australia Reddit.

    Could you elaborate on the partner effect a little more. Specifically if one partner is not working, e.g. unemployed or raising kids etc.


    1. Hey tempestuous man. That is a great idea and one I think I’ll need a dedicated blog post to tackle it. There are several variables to consider and if your partner is going to be long term unemployed you should definitely consider a trust. I’ll cover that in my post.

      Thanks 🙂

      1. That sounds like a great idea. I was actually asking as my Dad is currently unemployed and as he’s late fifties he’s struggling to find another job. Hence I was having a think about how my parents could earn a little more money by taking advantage of his unemployed status. Trying to find the silver lining!


        1. No worries, just remember that you have to sell your assets to your trust which could incur a cgt event. So it may only worth taking all current excess cash and investing it in the trust. Talk to an accountant to set it up and run through you with it all.

    1. Thanks SMA

      I hope to do some more in depth articles like this one on my blog in the future, they do take a toll compiling data, analyzing it and delivering it in a way that makes sense to real human beings and not just in my head.


  5. Hi Pat, great article!

    I found your blog through aussie firebug and have really enjoyed reading through your posts.

    I have been weighing up the differences in owning VAS vs a Listed Investment Company such as AFIC. Both have very low fees and similar returns over a very long period.

    However AFIC’s dividends are 100% fully franked where VAS dividends are usually about 70-80% franked. What are your thoughts on this?

    Also AFIC has an option to receive dividends as bonus shares rather than as dividends. It is called the DSSP (instead of DRP) and just selected the same way as you would the DRP.

    Essentially this means that you are not paying PAYG tax on the dividends, rather you pay tax on the capital gain that is added to your holding. However obviously you don’t pay this until you sell the shares. Now as I don’t really plan on selling them. I could effectively use the DSSP in the accumulation phase for the next ten years and then when I retire I can switch to receive normal dividend payments.

    Note: I would still be paying the 30% company tax rate. And this would only be beneficial for someone who is on a PAYG tax rate over 30%.

    Sorry if this all sounds confusing. Just thought it might be another great benefit of dividends.



    1. Hey Phil

      Glad I could give you have enjoyed it so far. My thoughts are that they are both fantastic investments and that you are very likely to do extremely will with your money in either. Their performance looks comparable over the long term One may do better than the other in the long term but I can’t comment on that.

      I do like the idea behind DSSP in this seems like a great positive to going with AFIC, like you said it is only beneficial for those on a marginal rate above 30% AND if you don’t plan to sell your shares. If you don’t meet both these criteria then it is a bit more complicated to calculate.

      The performance on AFICs website suggests they have been lagging the ASX200 in the 1,3 and 5 year timeframes. However ahead of the ASX200 in the 10 year timeframe. But do note that that figure measures from the start of the GFC till now, so the results could be skewed if one dropped more deeply/suddenly than the other and hence had a ‘larger’ recovery since then. 10 year results are going to be all over the place and appear much better than average until the end of 2018 due to the GFC.

  6. Coming into this post a bit late – just started reading your content and it is really interesting Pat. I think it is important to remember how heavily the ASX (the only place you’ll get franking credits) is weighted towards the financials and resources sector, at over 50% of the entire market in Australia! The big 4 banks sit around 25% themselves. Whilst it is always great to get tax breaks of any kind, it is important not to put that ahead of the risk of not being diversified. Vanguard do some fantastic research in this area and others.

    Looking forward to following your story mate

  7. Franking credits are cool, but I still think it’s important to invest where you get the greatest return.

    I’d rather an investment that returns 15% p.a over an investment that returns 10% p.a with 4% a year in 100% franked dividends.